<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Page comments</title>
		<link>http://optimation.co.nz/home/</link>
		<atom:link href="http://optimation.co.nz/home/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description></description>

		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by 'Rhys Lewis' on Why Google can host your apps for free</title>
			<link>http://optimation.co.nz/why-google-can-host-your-apps-for-free/#PageComment_16</link>
			<description>The reason why hosting companies have not instantly lost market share to Google is that Google's technology (a subset of Java) is only usable by someone who is familiar with deploying that type of application.

Hosting companies that offer shared solutions are also working on very thin margins.  It's not hard to find someone who will host a PHP based web application for $5/month with a generous allowance for storage and bandwidth.

The difference is that Google's app engine has the potential to scale far beyond the ability of a $5/month service with out needing to change the application itself.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 14:10:05 +1300</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rhys Lewis</dc:creator>
			<guid>http://optimation.co.nz/why-google-can-host-your-apps-for-free/#PageComment_16</guid>
		</item>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by 'Verdon' on Why Google can host your apps for free</title>
			<link>http://optimation.co.nz/why-google-can-host-your-apps-for-free/#PageComment_15</link>
			<description>so if all this is correct, how do hosting companies make a living?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 17:05:10 +1300</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Verdon</dc:creator>
			<guid>http://optimation.co.nz/why-google-can-host-your-apps-for-free/#PageComment_15</guid>
		</item>
		

	</channel>
</rss>